There is an article titled “The Rise of the 'Done with Church' Population” that has been sweeping across Internet. The writer simply discusses the increasing trend of people who were highly active in church, including leaders, that are exiting and not coming back. Of course, this subject matter is nothing new to me, having tackled it in the four part video series I co-produced with my friends David Fredrickson and Bob Humphrey titled Church Outside the Walls. I can't believe it's been eight years now since we produced the final video in that series and the topic is still completely relevant. In fact, it seems there has been a sudden resurgence of interest in this subject recently. I'd like to put in my two cents about the article.
First
of all, let me say, it is well written. I appreciate the author
bringing up the subject because I think it's an important one. One
thing I really don't like is the author's use of the word “church.”
But he is not alone in his usage of the word. When the Bible speaks
of church it speaks of those who are called out of this world to
follow Christ, period. So how can one be “done with church”
unless one is done with Christ? But today, for many, church is a
building where one goes to attend meetings. Attending those meeting
and being involved in activities held in those locations is viewed by
many as being a requirement for those who follow Christ. This
concept was completely foreign to the writers of the New Testament,
but sadly it is the widely accepted definition of church in our
culture today.
My
family and I are some of those who could be classified as those who
are “done with church.” But I can't tell you how much I hate
that phrase. It completely misrepresents the reality in which we
live. We are actually not done with church, but chose to embrace it.
We stopped attending because we wanted Jesus plus nothing. We grew
so frustrated and tired of all the added baggage. 2 Corinthians 11:3
became so real to us. “But I am afraid that, as the serpent
deceived Eve by his craftiness, your minds will be led astray from
the simplicity
and purity of devotion to Christ.” (NASB, emphasis added.) We
wanted to be able to build genuine relationships with our brothers
and sisters in Christ but found it was such a challenge to do so with
all the meetings and agendas. Most of the things done in those
settings became distractions from loving Christ and one another,
rather than motivators. We actually left not because we were done
with church but because we hungered for the reality of church!
We
discovered that you don't find the reality of church by trying to
come up with the best way to do church. Rather, we experience the
reality of church by growing in relationship with Father and loving
others. As we do so, we discover the reality of church springing up
all around us. Church is not a program or organization but something
we are. You don't need any man-made structures or add-ons to make
you more of what you already are. We just need Jesus and some people
to love. We truly believe Jesus meant what He said when He stated,
“I will build my church.” And we believe His lifestyle while He
walked among us showed us everything we need to know about being the
church. (How many organizations did Jesus start? How did He live
daily?)
The
writer of the article made this statement:
For the church, the phenomenon sets up a growing danger. The very people on whom the church relies for lay leadership, service and financial support are going away. And the problem is compounded by the fact younger people in the next generation, the Millennials, are not lining up to refill the empty pews.
It is
so strange that the writer refers to this trend as a “growing
danger.” Danger to what? The church of Jesus Christ? So Jesus
didn't mean what He said when He stated that the gates of hell would
not prevail against His church? The writer sounds as if he thinks
Jesus stopped building His church and left it in the hands of humans.
Could it be that what is being referred to is not the church Jesus
is building but man's? I find it interesting that this statement
alone contains the very reasons for which people are leaving. First
of all, notice that the writer states that the people who are leaving
are those who were relied on for “lay leadership, service, and
financial support.” In other words, they were resources to be used
to keep the machinery going. Is that really the way God views us?
Do we have a loving Father who desires relationship with us or do we
serve a user of people who views us as cogs needed to keep
organizations running smoothly? Is our purpose to serve
organizations or to love and be loved?
Also,
the writer uses a phrase that is poison to me and my family, as well
as many other who have left; “lay leadership.” I can't tell you
how much I despise the word “layman.” Why not just call us
“second class citizens?” That phrase is in direct opposition to
the priesthood of all believers that is our God-given place clearly
taught in the New Testament. That disgusting word strips us of our
identity in Christ. It's usage reveals that there are humans who are
better and superior to others in the body of Christ. It reveals a
belief that there are those who are truly spiritual and those who are
just kind of spiritual. I would rather be in a bar full of drunks
where I can function in my priestly role of connecting people to God
than be in an environment where I am denied my God-given function.
Hierarchies and ranks in the body of Christ are a big reason why
people like me have left. I venture to say the only danger that
exists in people leaving is to those who have vested interest in
maintaining the status quo.
The
writer goes on to state that it would be “better for churches to
focus on not losing people in the first place.” But there is a
problem with that mindset. What if God is leading them out the door?
Isn't it kind of a bold assumption to think that people are supposed
to remain in that environment? That it's a requirement? Do seasons
never change? If God is the One leading them out are you going to
position yourself between Him and them? Is there some kind of secret
code you're supposed to crack to keep people hanging around? And
don't you find it the least bit strange that when they stop attending
your services you view them as gone? Think hard about that one.
When I grew up and moved out of my parents' house they didn't by any
means view my relationship with them as being done. When friends of
mine moved to other locations my relationship with them didn't end.
So, why is it when somebody stops attending your services you view
the relationship as done? This reveals something very ugly. There
really was no genuine relationship. The relationship was entirely
based on expectations. You were in relationship as long as they did
what you wanted them to be doing. When they stopped, so did the
relationship. Guess what? That's not love. I don't care how many
times you say in your service “We're family!” the reality is
you're not. That's not how families function. And did it ever occur
to you that the very reason they walked out that door was they sensed
this? Something deep within them was telling them they were living
in a fake environment where words like “love,” “family,” and
“relationship,” are tossed around but not lived.
Let me
say bluntly, I do not believe people who are done with “church”
are better than those who still attend. I also don't believe there
aren't godly people who are desperately in love with Jesus in those
environments. But why not just call a spade a spade? For those who
choose to belong to these organizations, it's nothing more than a
matter of preference. Please don't take this wrong way, but in
truth, these are just Christian clubs. There is no sin in being a
part of one. But it's a matter of choice. And don't confuse them as
being the body of Christ. Yes, the Body of Christ may be present,
but the reality of the church extends far beyond those four walls.
Also,
we have been praying for years for revival. We've even made
statements like, “Do whatever it takes Lord!” Do we think God
has been ignoring us? Could it be that revival is happening but it
looks nothing like we expected and God is doing whatever it takes,
including tearing down many of our man-made systems?
Speaking
to believers all across this country, I've found that many, many, of
them are finding their relationship with Christ and love for one
another is indeed being revived. We can either embrace what God is
doing in this season or we can stand in opposition to Him. But make
know mistake about it, He is building His church. He never stopped.
Loren Rosser
Loren some of these people are simply good writers and sociologists who have no idea what lies beneath. They are just trained to share visible systems and symptoms. More diagnostic than cathartic.Here is where the rubber meets the road. http://godsleader.com/10-questions-organic-church/
ReplyDeleteGood article Jose.
ReplyDeleteI have been wanting to write "On Being the Church or Going to Church" but you've done an excellent job of it, I will now simply share. Thank you Brother, thank you.......
ReplyDeleteThanks Living Large!
ReplyDeleteThe word church should not be in the Bible. The word means building. The body of Christ consisting of all members of Christs body and is the building Christ lives in. It is not a physical building but a spiritual building. So then everywhere the body of Christ is that is where Christ is. It may be in a religious building, Walmart or wherever you are.The correct word is congregation or assembly. Some early Bible translations had the word translated correctly. Other like the Geneva, Rheims, KJV and Bishops Bibles use church or building. The building of Christ is all living stones built into the one body.
ReplyDeleteForgot one thing. My website is www.calledoutnow.wordpress.com
ReplyDelete